Governance
Levy Arrears in a Body Corporate: The Lawful Way to Collect, Step by Step

The trustee meeting has reached the arrears report, and the same unit is on it again. Eight months behind, no response to emails, and the scheme's municipal account is due in ten days. Someone suggests cutting the unit's electricity until the owner pays. Someone else wants to hand the matter straight to attorneys. A third trustee worries the scheme cannot afford either the legal fees or the fight.
This scene plays out in bodies corporate across South Africa every month, and the pressure is real: levies are the only income most schemes have. But arrears collection is one of the areas where the law is strict about process, and where the intuitive shortcuts, disconnections, gate blocking, naming and shaming, are exactly the ones that land trustees at the Community Schemes Ombud Service (CSOS) as respondents rather than applicants. This guide walks through the escalation path that works: what you may charge, the notices you must send, when to go to CSOS versus court, and the deadlines that quietly erode your claim if you sit on it.
Why arrears are every owner's problem
A body corporate is not a business with a profit margin. Its budget is approved at the annual general meeting and divided among owners, usually in proportion to participation quotas. When one owner stops paying, the shortfall does not disappear. The scheme either delays maintenance, dips into its reserve fund, or raises a special levy, which means the paying owners are subsidising the one who is not.
That is worth saying out loud at your AGM, because firm collections are sometimes painted as heartless. They are not. Trustees have a duty to collect the contributions the scheme needs to operate, and a consistent, documented process protects everyone, including the owner in arrears, who is entitled to fair and lawful treatment rather than improvised punishment.
What you may lawfully charge on overdue levies
Interest, if it is properly authorised. Under the prescribed management rules made under the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act (STSMA), a body corporate may charge interest on overdue contributions, but only if the charge has been properly resolved and recorded, and only at a rate that does not exceed the maximum permitted under the National Credit Act, compounded monthly in arrear. A rate someone once wrote into a spreadsheet, with no resolution behind it, is open to challenge. If your scheme charges interest, make sure the resolution exists, the rate is minuted, and the same rate is applied to every account in arrears. Selective enforcement is a gift to the defaulting owner's attorney.
Reasonable collection costs. The rules also entitle the body corporate to recover reasonable legal costs and disbursements actually incurred in collecting arrears, provided the underlying process was lawful. Keep the invoices and keep them itemised.
Nothing else. Administrative "penalties", arbitrary fines for late payment, or inflated charges dressed up as costs are not part of the framework and tend to be struck down when tested.
The escalation path, step by step
Step 1: Get the levy itself right. A levy is only enforceable if it was validly raised: a budget approved at a general meeting, followed by written notice to owners of the amounts due, the due dates, and the fact that interest will run on overdue amounts. Schemes lose otherwise winnable arrears cases because the paper trail behind the levy is missing. Before escalating anything, confirm you can produce the AGM minutes, the approved budget, and the levy notices.
Step 2: Statement and reminder. The first response to a missed payment should be routine and immediate: a statement reflecting the arrears and a written reminder. Most arrears at this stage are admin failures, a changed debit order, a sold unit, an email going to a dead address. A same-week reminder resolves many of them without conflict.
Step 3: Final demand. If reminders are ignored, send a formal letter of demand: the outstanding amount, the interest accruing, a clear deadline (14 days is common practice), and a plain statement of what happens next if payment is not made. Send it in a way you can prove, and keep a copy. This letter is the hinge of the whole process; both CSOS adjudicators and magistrates will want to see it.
Step 4: Consider a payment arrangement. Trustees may agree to a written payment plan, and often should. An owner paying down arrears at a realistic monthly rate is a better outcome than a legal process that takes a year and adds costs to a debt that was already hard to recover. Put the arrangement in writing, minute it, and record that interest continues to run unless the trustees resolve otherwise.
Step 5: Choose your forum: CSOS or court. If demand and negotiation fail, the body corporate has two lawful routes. It can apply to CSOS for an order for payment of arrear contributions, or it can sue in the Magistrates' Court (or High Court for large amounts). CSOS is cheaper and designed for community scheme disputes, and its process of conciliation followed by adjudication suits straightforward arrears matters. Court is the route when you need robust enforcement machinery: a judgment that can be executed against the owner's movable property and, as a genuine last resort and with judicial oversight, against the unit itself. Many schemes use attorneys for court matters and handle CSOS applications with their managing agent. One important point either way: an owner who disputes an amount must still pay while the dispute runs. Withholding levies is not a lawful form of protest.
Step 6: The transfer embargo is your backstop. South African law prevents transfer of a unit until the body corporate certifies that all amounts due have been paid or that arrangements to its satisfaction have been made. Every unit eventually sells, and the arrears must be settled at that point. The embargo is powerful, but it is a backstop, not a strategy: waiting years for a sale while the debt compounds, and while the scheme bleeds cash, is not a collections policy.
What you may never do
This list matters because every item on it is attempted regularly, and every item creates liability for the scheme.
- Disconnecting water or electricity because of arrear levies. Cutting a supply the owner currently enjoys, without a court order or the owner's genuine agreement, is spoliation: taking the law into your own hands. Courts have ordered schemes to restore supply and pay costs, and CSOS has stated in its circulars that scheme rules providing for disconnection of essential services over unpaid levies are regarded as undesirable and will not pass muster.
- Blocking access, deactivating gate tags, or barring owners from common property as a levy-collection tactic. Same principle, same outcome.
- Naming and shaming. Publishing a list of defaulters to the whole scheme creates POPIA problems and defamation risk, and it does not get the levy paid. Arrears are discussed at trustee level and with the owner concerned.
- Charging unauthorised interest or invented penalties, covered above.
If the scheme is genuinely carrying an owner's consumption costs, there are lawful tools: prepaid utility meters installed under the scheme's rules, or a CSOS application to have a tenant's rent redirected to the body corporate where a tenanted unit is in arrears.
Do not sit on arrears: prescription is running
Levy debt prescribes, in the ordinary course, three years after each amount became due, under the Prescription Act. Prescription is interrupted when the debtor acknowledges the debt (a part payment counts) or when a summons is served, and case law recognises some protection for bodies corporate given the relationship between a scheme and its members, but no trustee should rely on that. A scheme that lets arrears age past three years without demand, acknowledgment or summons risks losing the oldest slice of the debt entirely. The practical rule is simple: act inside the first ninety days, every time, for every account.
A collections policy worth adopting
- Approve a written arrears policy at trustee level: reminder at 7 days, final demand at 30 days, handover or CSOS application at 60 to 90 days.
- Resolve and minute the interest rate, within the National Credit Act maximum, and apply it uniformly.
- Keep the levy paper trail: AGM minutes, approved budget, levy notices, statements, demands.
- Offer payment plans in writing before litigating, and record them.
- Report arrears by age at every trustee meeting so nothing drifts toward prescription.
- Never disconnect, block, or shame. Escalate through CSOS or the courts instead.
What this looks like in Votera
Most collection failures are process failures: the reminder that was never sent, the resolution that was never minuted, the account that quietly aged past the point of easy recovery. Votera is built to make the process automatic. Levy schedules and owner statements live in one place, so the paper trail behind every amount is a click away rather than a search through old inboxes. Arrears are flagged by age, reminders and final demands go out on the timeline in your collections policy, and every notice, resolution and payment arrangement is stored against the unit's record. When a matter does go to CSOS or to attorneys, you export a complete, dated history instead of reconstructing one. Trustees see an ageing summary at every meeting, which is exactly the visibility that stops a three-month problem becoming a three-year one.
Votera is an HOA and body corporate management platform built for South African community schemes, covering governance, maintenance, vendor compliance, and resident communication in one dashboard. See how the relevant module works or start a free 30-day trial.